1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Nanobubbles (ultrafine bubbles <200 nm) are an emerging technology for water treatment and disinfection. They remain suspended in water due to high internal pressure and surface charge, offering extremely high gas–liquid interfacial area and long residence times. In pools, nanobubbles enhance disinfection by:
(1) Generating reactive oxygen species (especially ·OH radicals) upon bubble collapse
(2) Providing intense microjets and shear stresses to disrupt microbes
(3) Vastly improving gas transfer and oxidant delivery (e.g. ozone transfer) through their large surface area and persistence.
Lab studies show significant pathogen reduction: e.g. ozone nanobubbles achieved ~96–99% kill of bacteria (Streptococcus, Aeromonas) with 10-min treatments, and air nanobubbles plus chlorine gave a 5.5-log E. coli reduction.
Compared to conventional methods, nanobubble systems can dramatically cut chlorine or chemical use, multi-year chemical savings while achieving rapid inactivation. They leave no persistent disinfectant residual (like ozone or hydrogen peroxide break down to O₂/H₂O) and produce essentially no disinfection byproducts. Nanokriti’s real-world demonstrations have shown nanobubble technology can rapidly clear algae blooms, reduce odours and can maintain good water quality parameters.
The Nanokriti NanoE is a high-efficiency ozone based nanobubble generation system designed for water treatment and disinfection applications, including swimming pools. Available in 40–100 m³/h capacities, the system generates ~80-120 nm nanobubbles with a concentration exceeding 1 × 10⁸ nanobubbles/mL. Its optimized gas transfer technology delivers 70–85% gas transfer efficiency, ensuring effective dissolution and utilization of the gas. The plug-and-play design enables easy installation, low-maintenance operation, seamless retrofitting into existing filtration systems, and compatibility with all swimming pool types.
2.0 NANOBUBBLES DEFINITION AND PHYSICS:
Nanobubbles (NBs) are ultrafine gas bubbles (<200 nm) with unique physicochemical properties, including long-term stability, high surface-area-to-volume ratio, and negatively charged interfaces. Unlike larger bubbles, nanobubbles do not quickly float to the surface; their high internal pressure (from surface tension) is balanced by a strong negative surface charge (zeta potential). This charged interface creates electrostatic repulsion that prevents bubble coalescence and leads to extraordinary longevity (hours to days).
Physically, nanobubbles possess extremely high surface-area-to-volume ratios, which enhances gas liquid mass transfer. When nanobubbles collapse (e.g. due to pressure changes or ultrasound), they generate microjets and shockwaves and produce reactive radicals (especially hydroxyl ·OH) from water splitting. These powerful local effects underlie their disinfecting action. For example, one study noted that microbubble collapse creates free radicals from high ion density at the interface. Typical zeta potentials are around –20 mV for air nanobubbles and –40 mV for oxygen nanobubbles, meaning they carry a stable negative charge. As a result, nanobubble water can carry elevated dissolved gas levels for extended periods.
3.0 DISINFECTION MECHANISM:
Nanobubbles aid disinfection through multiple synergistic effects:
Enhanced Oxidative Species: Nanobubbles themselves (especially oxygen or ozone) can
generate reactive species. On collapse, tiny bubbles (or microbubbles in a nanobubble slurry)
create localized high pressures and temperatures, splitting water into hydroxyl radicals (·OH).
In nanobubble ozone (O₃-NB) systems, the remarkable stability of ozone in NBs leads to prolonged release of oxidants; studies report significantly higher residual oxidants and ·OH generation compared to conventional ozone sparging.
Physical Disruption: The collapse of nanobubbles or microbubbles generates shock waves and microjets, imparting shear forces that can disrupt cell membranes or biofilms. Studies observed mechanical damage (“microjets, high shear”) augmenting oxidative kill, although nanobubbles are too small to physically scour surfaces, their collapse energy helps weaken pathogens, as also noted in ultrasonication studies.
Enhanced Mass Transfer: Nanobubbles dramatically increase gas–water contact area. Unlike millimeter bubbles that quickly rise, nanobubbles stay suspended, dissolving gas over minutes for hours. This means oxidizing gases (O₃, O₂) are delivered deeper and more uniformly. one review notes O₃-NBs yield “significantly improved disinfection capacity and residual activity of ozone” due to better dissolution. Air/O₂ NBs maintain high dissolved oxygen, supporting aerobic microbial competition.
In summary, nanobubbles combine physicochemical disinfection: they both oxidize contaminants and mechanically stress microorganisms. The net result can be faster kill times and fewer added chemicals.
4.0 COMPARISON WITH CONVENTIONAL METHODS:
Compared to traditional pool treatments, nanobubble systems offer unique trade-offs:
Efficacy/Contact Time: Chlorine and bromine can achieve 5–7 log kill of most bacteria within minutes, but take very long (hours to days) to inactivate Cryptosporidium (a microscopic protozoan parasite that causes the diarrheal disease). UV can inactivate Crypto quickly (2–5 log) but leaves no residual. Ozone (especially O₃ nanobubbles) is known to rapidly inactivate Crypto and Giardia (Olympic pools mandate ozone). Nanobubble-augmented ozone or peroxide similarly works in seconds to minutes. Non-chemical NBs (air/O₂ alone) kill more slowly (via biology) and are not a standalone disinfection for pathogens.
Residual & Byproducts: Chlorine leaves free chlorine/chloramine residuals and forms harmful DBPs (THMs, chloramines). Nanobubbles: Leave no harmful residual; oxidants rapidly decompose and generate little to no additional DBPs.
Operational Complexity: Chlorine is Simple to operate but requires hazardous chemical storage and handling. Nanokriti nanobubble generators are plug-and-play, IoT-enabled systems with easy operation, remote monitoring, and smartphone control.
Overall, nanobubble-augmented ozone or peroxide systems combine many advantages of ozone/UV disinfection (rapid kill, no DBPs) with improved gas delivery. They may reduce chemical needs by 70- 100%.
4.0 SYSTEM INTEGRATION:
The Nanokriti NanoE nanobubble generator can be easily retrofitted into existing swimming pool recirculation systems. Installed after the filtration unit and before the return line, it uniformly distributes nanobubble-enriched water throughout the pool. The system is plug-and-play, IoT-enabled for remote monitoring, requires minimal maintenance, and is easy to operate.
Figure: NanoE Nanobubble generator installation Schematic
5.0 FIELD IMPLEMENTATIONS AND CASE STUDIES:
Nanokriti’s nanobubble generators have been validated through multiple full-scale field deployments across environmental and industrial water treatment applications. The technology has been successfully implemented for community pond rejuvenation, textile wastewater treatment, and industrial wastewater management.
In community ponds, continuous nanobubble generation improved dissolved oxygen levels, reduced algal growth, eliminated foul odours, and enhanced overall water quality. In industrial applications, the technology has demonstrated improved treatment efficiency through enhanced oxygen transfer and oxidation processes.
These large-scale implementations demonstrate the robustness, reliability, and continuous operational capability of the nanobubble generation system under real-world conditions, providing a strong foundation for its application in swimming pool water treatment.
6.0 CONCLUSION:
Nanobubble technology offers a next-generation approach to swimming pool disinfection by combining superior gas transfer, advanced oxidation, and reduced chemical dependence. Its unique physicochemical properties enable rapid pathogen inactivation, improved water quality, and minimal formation of harmful disinfection by-products. When integrated with ozone, nanobubbles significantly enhance oxidant utilisation, delivering efficient, uniform, and sustainable disinfection.
Backed by scientific research and validated through Nanokriti’s field deployments, the NanoE nanobubble generation system provides a practical, scalable, and environmentally responsible solution for modern swimming pool water treatment, helping operators achieve safer, cleaner, and healthier pools with lower operating costs.
7.0 REFERENCES:
- Nirmalkar, N., Pacek, A. W., & Barigou, M. (2018). On the existence and stability of bulk nanobubbles. Langmuir, 34(39), 11857–11862.
- Agarwal, A., Ng, W. J., & Liu, Y. (2011). Principle and applications of microbubble and nanobubble technology for water treatment. Chemosphere, 84(9), 1175–1180.
- Temesgen, T., Bui, T. T., Han, M., Kim, T. I., & Park, H. (2017). Micro and nanobubble technologies as a new horizon for water treatment techniques: A review. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 246, 40–51.
- Ushikubo, F. Y., Furukawa, T., Nakagawa, R., Enari, M., Makino, Y., Kawagoe, Y., … & Yasui, K. (2010). Evidence of the existence and the stability of nano-bubbles in water. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 361(1–3), 31–37.
- Takahashi, M. (2005). Potential of microbubbles in aqueous solutions: Electrical properties of the gas–water interface. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 109(46), 21858–21864.
- ISO 24516-1:2016. Guidelines for the management of assets of water supply and wastewater systems. International Organization for Standardization (ISO).
- World Health Organization. (2021). Guidelines for Safe Recreational Water Environments, Volume 2: Swimming Pools and Similar Environments. World Health Organization.
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2023). Water Treatment Technologies. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
- American Public Health Association (APHA). (2023). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (24th ed.). APHA, AWWA, WEF.
- Aieta, E. M., & Berg, J. D. (1986). A review of chlorine dioxide in drinking water treatment. Journal – American Water Works Association, 78(6), 62–72.
- Li, P., Takahashi, M., & Chiba, K. (2009). Enhanced free-radical generation by shrinking microbubbles using a copper catalyst. Chemosphere, 77(8), 1157–1160.